BA's thoughts on who Giants Might Draft
Points to take away:
- The 2006 draft looks underwhelming at the moment, though much can change after spring games. The scouts see 2006 as being thin on position players. My take is this is not a problem for the Giants who draft pitchers predominantly.
- They see signability as a factor in the Giants pick.
- They note that the Giants don't have any pattern to their picks, college vs. H.S., hitters vs. pitchers with their early picks.
- Their best guess as to the top player in each of these categories are Evan Longoria, Oregon State RHP Dallas Buck, The Woodlands (Texas) High RHP Kyle Drabek, and Monsignor Pace High (Opa Locka, Fla.) 3B Chris Marrero.
1 Comments:
Thanks for the post, Teh.
How do you get four top-50 picks? I see 10th and I assume you mean their 2nd round pick at 40th, but supplemental picks should push that beyond the 50th pick. Then you got the pick we get for Eyre, because we are trying to resign him but I am guessing you think he's gone (sadly, I think so as well). That's three.
I don't see the fourth one unless some team is stupid enough to sign Tomko before we don't get a pick unless we offer him arbitration - and the Giants are not going to offer him arbitration. Tomko isn't worth losing a draft pick over, only the Giants appear to follow such a strategy. I assume Snow is not eligible for a pick but even if he were, we're not offering him arbitration either. And Fassero already re-signed with us. So you've stumped me and now I am really curious where you got the fourth pick from (or the others if I made the wrong assumptions above).
Post a Comment
<< Home